4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Practical Multiple Scattering for Rough Surfaces

Journal

ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3272127.3275016

Keywords

microfacets; multiple scattering

Funding

  1. Korea NRF [2016R1A2B2013031, 2013M3A6A6073718]
  2. KOCCA in MCST of Korea
  3. Cross-Ministry Giga KOREA Project [GK17P0200]
  4. Samsung Electronics [SRFC-IT1402-02]
  5. ICT R&D program of MSIT/IITP of Korea [2017-0-00072, 2016-0-00018]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [682080]
  7. DARPA
  8. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [TIN2016-78753-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microfacet theory concisely models light transport over rough surfaces. Specular reflection is the result of single mirror reflections on each facet, while exact computation of multiple scattering is either neglected, or modeled using costly importance sampling techniques. Practical but accurate simulation of multiple scattering in microfacet theory thus remains an open challenge. In this work, we revisit the traditional V-groove cavity model and derive an analytical, cost-effective solution for multiple scattering in rough surfaces. Our kaleidoscopic model is made up of both real and virtual V-grooves, and allows us to calculate higher-order scattering in the microfacets in an analytical fashion. We then extend our model to include nonsymmetric grooves, allowing for additional degrees of freedom on the surface geometry, improving multiple reflections at grazing angles with backward compatibility to traditional normal distribution functions. We validate the accuracy of our model against ground-truth Monte Carlo simulations, and demonstrate its flexibility on anisotropic and textured materials. Our model is analytical, does not introduce significant cost and variance, can be seamless integrated in any rendering engine, preserves reciprocity and energy conservation, and is suitable for bidirectional methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available