4.0 Article

Comparison of augmentation index derived from multiple devices

Journal

ARTERY RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 112-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.artres.2011.06.002

Keywords

Arterial wave reflection; Augmentation index; Arterial stiffness; Applanation tonometry; Vascular device

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most commonly evaluated features of the arterial pressure waveforms is augmentation index (AI). Multiple devices have been developed and marketed that measure AI at peripheral arteries. Currently, it is not known if and how these measures of AI are related. Aortic and radial AI (using SphygmoCor), radial AI (Omron), and finger AI (Itamar) were measured in 40 apparently healthy subjects. All the AI values were correlated with each other with Pearson r-values ranging from 0.78 to 0.94. The coefficients of variation ranged from 3.4 to 20.0%. We concluded that even though the absolute values derived by each technique were different, there were high and significant correlations between AI values. (C) 2011 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available