4.3 Article

Intraoperative Monitoring of an Aspect of Executive Functions: Administration of the Stroop Test in 9 Adult Patients During Awake Surgery for Resection of Frontal Glioma

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 169-180

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827bf1d6

Keywords

Anterior cingular cortex; Awake brain surgery; Executive functions; Glioma; Stroop test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Awake brain surgery allows extensive intraoperative monitoring of not only motor and sensory functions and language but also executive functions. OBJECTIVE: To administer the Stroop test intraoperatively to avoid dramatic side effects such as akinetic mutism and to monitor executive functions in an attempt to optimize the benefit/risk balance of surgery. METHODS: A series of 9 adult patients with frontal glioma were operated on for gross tumor resection under local anesthesia. All procedures involved the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). RESULTS: Three types of response to the Stroop test were observed: 3 patients had a Stroop effect only for stimulation of the contralateral ACC; 3 patients had a Stroop effect for stimulation of the ipsilateral ACC; and 3 patients had no Stroop effect. Preoperative and postoperative neuropsychological and surgical results are presented and discussed. Stimulation sites eliciting a Stroop effect are compared with published image-based data, and insight provided by these surgical data regarding ACC function and plasticity is discussed. No operative complication related to intraoperative administration of the Stroop test was observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of the Stroop test during resection of gliomas involving the ACC in adult patients is an option for intraoperative monitoring of executive functions during awake surgery. Globally, these results suggest functional compensation, mediated by plasticity mechanisms, by contralateral homologous regions of the ACC in adult patients with frontal glioma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available