4.4 Article

Kinetic and stoichiometric characterization of organoautotrophic growth of Ralstonia eutropha on formic acid in fed-batch and continuous cultures

Journal

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 155-163

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12149

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Advanced Research Project Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)
  2. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
  3. French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
  4. French Ministry of Higher Education and Research following the France-MIT Energy Forum
  5. MIT-France Seed Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formic acid, acting as both carbon and energy source, is a safe alternative to a carbon dioxide, hydrogen and dioxygen mix for studying the conversion of carbon through the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle into value-added chemical compounds by non-photosynthetic microorganisms. In this work, organoautotrophic growth of Ralstoniaeutropha on formic acid was studied using an approach combining stoichiometric modeling and controlled cultures in bioreactors. A strain deleted of its polyhydroxyalkanoate production pathway was used in order to carry out a physiological characterization. The maximal growth yield was determined at 0.16 Cmole Cmole(-1) in a formate-limited continuous culture. The measured yield corresponded to 76% to 85% of the theoretical yield (later confirmed in pH-controlled fed-batch cultures). The stoichiometric study highlighted the imbalance between carbon and energy provided by formic acid and explained the low growth yields measured. Fed-batch cultures were also used to determine the maximum specific growth rate ((max)=0.18h(-1)) and to study the impact of increasing formic acid concentrations on growth yields. High formic acid sensitivity was found in Reutropha since a linear decrease in the biomass yield with increasing residual formic acid concentrations was observed between 0 and 1.5gl(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available