4.7 Article

Turbulent nitrate fluxes in the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary, Canada

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages 2308-2330

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010272

Keywords

turbulent nitrate flux; turbulence; mixing; St; Lawrence; coastal mixing

Categories

Funding

  1. Le Fonds de recherche du Quebec Nature et technologies
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation and Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Turbulent vertical nitrate fluxes were calculated using new turbulent microstructure observations in the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary (LSLE), Canada. Two stations were compared: the head of the Laurentian Channel (HLC), where intense mixing occurs on the shallow sill that marks the upstream limit of the LSLE, and another station located about 100 km downstream (St. 23), more representative of the LSLE mean mixing conditions. Mean turbulent diffusivities and nitrate fluxes at the base of the surface layer for both stations were, respectively (with 95% confidence intervals): KHLC=8.6(3.2,19)x10-3m2s-13=4.4(2.3,7.6)x10-5m2s-1,LC=95(18,300)mmolm-2d-1, and 23=0.21(0.12,0.33)mmolm-2d-1. Observations suggest that the interplay between large isopleth heaving near the sill and strong turbulence is the key mechanism to sustain such high turbulent nitrate fluxes at the HLC (two to three orders of magnitude higher than those at Station 23). Calculations also suggest that nitrate fluxes at the HLC alone can sustain primary production rates of 3.4(0.6,11)gCmover the whole LSLE, approximately enough to account for a large part of the phytoplankton bloom and for most of the postbloom production. Surfacing nitrates are also believed to be consumed within the LSLE, not leaving much to be exported to the rest of the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available