4.7 Article

Quantifying the energy dissipation of overriding plate deformation in three-dimensional subduction models

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 519-536

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JB011419

Keywords

subduction; analog modeling; overriding plate deformation; overriding plate deformation force; negative buoyancy; energy dissipation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP110103387]
  2. APA scholarship
  3. IPRS scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a subduction system the force and the energy required to deform the overriding plate are generally thought to come from the negative buoyancy of the subducted slab and its potential energy, respectively. Such deformation might involve extension and back-arc basin formation or shortening and mountain building. How much of the slab's potential energy is consumed during overriding plate deformation remains unknown. In this work, we present dynamic three-dimensional laboratory experiments of progressive subduction with an overriding plate to quantify the force (F-OPD) that drives overriding plate deformation and the associated energy dissipation rate ((OPD)), and we compare them with the negative buoyancy (F-BU) of the subducted slab and its total potential energy release rate ((BU)), respectively. We varied the viscosity ratio between the plates and the sublithospheric upper mantle with (SP)/(UM)=157-560 and the thickness of the overriding plate with T-OP=0.5-2.5cm (scaling to 25-125km in nature). The results show that F-OPD/F-BU has average values of 0.5-2.0%, with a maximum of 5.3%, and (OPD)/(BU) has average values of 0.05-0.30%, with a maximum of 0.41%. The results indicate that only a small portion of the negative buoyancy of the slab and its potential energy are used to deform the overriding plate. Our models also suggest that the force required to deform the overriding plate is of comparable magnitude as the ridge push force. Furthermore, we show that in subduction models with an overriding plate bending dissipation at the subduction zone hinge remains low (3-15% during steady state subduction).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available