4.2 Article

Analytical evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin T assay and its clinical assessment in acute coronary syndrome

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 452-458

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1258/acb.2011.011019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Roche Diagnostics
  2. Roche Diagnostics (Meylan, France)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The recently developed, highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) immunoassay improves the detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, this assay requires further analytical and clinical evaluation. Methods: Imprecision, linearity, limits of quantification and interferences were evaluated; hs-cTnT was compared with a conventional cardiac troponin I assay (cTnI), performed on an X-pand (R) HM, in a population of patients with suspected AMI. Finally, the 99th percentile cut-off point for a reference population was explored in 213 healthy control subjects. Results: Imprecision analysis demonstrated coefficients of variation (CVs) below 4%, linearity showed a 0.999 coefficient of correlation, with excellent recovery (99.9%) and a limit of quantification (10%CV) was found at 9.2 ng/L. A negative interference (>20%) with haemolysis was observed when supplemental haemoglobin was above 0.25 g/dL. Patients with suspected AMI more frequently displayed an increased hs-cTnT (83%) than an increased cTnI (55%, P < 0.01). Unstable angina was present in 63% of patients with an increased hs-cTnT associated with no increase in cTnI. The 99th percentile value for our reference population was 16.9 ng/L. In 213 healthy blood donors, hs-cTnT levels were significantly correlated with age (P < 0.0001), and were higher in men than in women (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The analytical performance of hs-cTnT complied with the international guidelines for AMI detection. Determining the degree of haemolysis in a sample is of paramount importance to the interpretation of hs-cTnT results. The 99th percentile value of our reference population was established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available