4.5 Article

Fetal skeletal computed tomography: When? How? Why?

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages 1045-1053

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORPORATION OFFICE
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.04.014

Keywords

Prenatal diagnosis; Constitutional bone diseases; 2D ultrasound; CT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To study the additional role of fetal skeletal computed tomography in suspected prenatal bone abnormalities. Materials and methods: Two centers included in a retrospective study all fetuses who benefited from skeletal computed tomography for a suspected constitutional bone disease or focal dysostosis. Results: A total of 198 patients were included. CT was performed in 112 patients (56%) for an isolated short femur below the third percentile (group A), in 15 patients (8%) for bowed or fractured femur (group B), in 23 patients (12%) for biometric discrepancy between a short femur and increased head circumference (group C) and in 48 patients (24%) for suspected focal dysostosis (group D). CT was interpreted as normal in 126 cases (64%), i.e. 87% in group A, 0% in group B, 65% in group C and 25% in group D. When including only cases with postnatal or postmortem clinical and/or radiological confirmation was available, CT provided additional and/or more accurate information than ultrasound in 20% of cases in group A, 66% in group B, 30% in group C and 72% in group D. Sixty-seven percent of patients in whom CT was interpreted as normal were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: In isolated short femur, fetal skeletal CT is normal in the great majority of cases although protocolized follow-up of these babies is absolutely compulsory, as a large proportion is lost to follow-up. Fetal skeletal CT can confirm or improve imaging for the suspected diagnosisin suspected focal dysostosis or constitutional bone disease. (C) 2014 Editions francaises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available