4.6 Article

Evapotranspiration in Northern Eurasia: Impact of forcing uncertainties on terrestrial ecosystem model estimates

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages 2647-2660

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022531

Keywords

evapotranspiration; Northern Eurasia; terrestrial ecosystem model; climate reanalysis; forcing uncertainty

Funding

  1. NASA [NASA-NNX09AI26G, NN-H-04-Z-YS-005-N, NNX09AM55G]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER64599]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF-1028291, NSF-0919331, AGS 0847472]
  4. NSF [NSF-0630319]
  5. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [863.14.004]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. ICER [1523628] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [0847472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  11. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1028291] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. NASA [NNX09AM55G, 114169] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ecosystems in Northern Eurasia (NE) play an important role in the global water cycle and the climate system. While evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical variable to understand this role, ET over this region remains largely unstudied. Using an improved version of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model with five widely used forcing data sets, we examine the impact that uncertainties in climate forcing data have on the magnitude, variability, and dominant climatic drivers of ET for the period 1979-2008. Estimates of regional average ET vary in the range of 241.4-335.7mmyr(-1) depending on the choice of forcing data. This range corresponds to as much as 32% of the mean ET. Meanwhile, the spatial patterns of long-term average ET across NE are generally consistent for all forcing data sets. Our ET estimates in NE are largely affected by uncertainties in precipitation (P), air temperature (T), incoming shortwave radiation (R), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). During the growing season, the correlations between ET and each forcing variable indicate that T is the dominant factor in the north and P in the south. Unsurprisingly, the uncertainties in climate forcing data propagate as well to estimates of the volume of water available for runoff (here defined as P-ET). While the Climate Research Unit data set is overall the best choice of forcing data in NE according to our assessment, the quality of these forcing data sets remains a major challenge to accurately quantify the regional water balance in NE. Key Points

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available