4.5 Article

First direct observation of sputtered lunar oxygen

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 709-722

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019207

Keywords

Moon; energetic neutral atoms; oxygen; sputter; atmosphere; solar wind

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first direct measurement of neutral oxygen in the lunar exosphere, detected by the Chandrayaan-1 Energetic Neutral Analyzer (CENA). With the lunar surface consisting of about 60% of oxygen in number, the neutral oxygen detected in CENA's energy range (11eV-3.3keV) is attributed to have originated from the lunar surface, where it was released through solar wind ion sputtering. Fitting of CENA's mass spectra with calibration spectra from ground and in-flight data resulted in the detection of a robust oxygen signal, with a flux of 0.2 to 0.4 times the flux of backscattered hydrogen, depending on the solar wind helium content and particle velocity. For the two solar wind types observed, we derive subsolar surface oxygen atom densities of N-0= (1.1 0.3) 10(7)m(-3) and (1.4 0.4) 10(7)m(-3), respectively, which agree well with earlier model predictions and measured upper limits. From these surface densities, we derive column densities of N-C= (1.5 0.5) 10(13)m(-2)and (1.6 0.5) 10(13)m(-2). In addition, we identified for the first time a helium component. This helium is attributed to backscattering of solar wind helium (alpha particles) from the lunar surface as neutral energetic helium atoms, which has also been observed for the first time. This identification is supported by the characteristic energy of the measured helium atoms, which is roughly 4 times the energy of reflected solar wind hydrogen, and the correlation with solar wind helium content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available