4.7 Article

Relationships between inherent optical properties and the depth of penetration of solar radiation in optically complex coastal waters

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 118, Issue 5, Pages 2310-2317

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20182

Keywords

diffuse attenuation models; euphotic depth; coastal optics

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H021493/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/H021493/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The attenuation of downward planar irradiance can be quantified by (K) over bar (d) (E-10%, lambda), the diffuse attenuation coefficient calculated from the surface to the depth where the irradiance E-d at wavelength lambda falls to 10% of its surface value. Theoretical studies by Gordon (1989) and Lee et al. (2005a) suggest that (K) over bar (d) (E-10%, lambda) can be derived from the absorption coefficient, a(lambda) and the backscattering coefficient, b(b)(lambda), using equations incorporating either the solar zenith angle (theta(a)) or the subsurface distribution function (D-0) and empirical coefficients derived by radiative transfer modeling. These results have not, however, been validated against in situ measurements. We have therefore assessed the performance of both models using measurements of a(lambda), b(b)(lambda), and (K) over bar (d) (E-10%, lambda) for 100 stations in UK coastal waters. Best results were obtained from the Lee et al. (2005a) model, for which over 90% of the predicted (K) over bar (d) (E-10%, lambda) values in the 440 nm to 665 nm range were within +/-0.1 m(-1) of those measured in situ. A strong linear relationship (R-2 > 0.95, mean relative difference 5.4%) was found between (K) over bar (d) (E-10%, lambda) at 490 nm and the reciprocal of the depth of the midpoint of the euphotic zone (z(10%), PAR). This allowed (z(10%), PAR) to be predicted from measured values of a(490 nm), b(b)(490 nm) and theta(a), using the Lee et al. model as an intermediate step, with an RMS error of 1.25 m over the 2.5-25.0 m range covered by our data set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available