4.5 Article

The capacity of mid-pregnancy cervical length to predict preterm birth in low-risk women: a national cohort study

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1223-1234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12721

Keywords

Cervical length measurement; preterm birth; low-risk population

Funding

  1. ZonMw, the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development [50-50110-96-530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionWe investigated the predictive capacity of mid-trimester cervical length (CL) measurement for spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth. Material and methodsWe performed a prospective observational cohort study in nulliparous women and low-risk multiparous women with a singleton pregnancy between 16(+0) and 21(+6)weeks of gestation. We assessed the prognostic capacity of transvaginally measured mid-trimester CL for spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth (<37weeks) using likelihood ratios (LR) and receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. We calculated numbers needed to screen to prevent one preterm birth assuming different treatment effects. Main outcome measures were preterm birth <32, <34 and <37weeks. ResultsWe studied 11943 women, of whom 666 (5.6%) delivered preterm: 464 (3.9%) spontaneous and 202 (1.7%) iatrogenic. Mean CL was 44.1mm (SD 7.8mm). In nulliparous women, the LRs for spontaneous preterm birth varied between 27 (95% CI 7.7-95) for a CL20mm, and 2.0 (95% CI 1.6-2.5) for a CL between 30 and 35mm. For low-risk multiparous women, these LRs were 37 (95% CI 7.5-182) and 1.5 (95% CI 0.97-2.2), respectively. Using a cut-off for CL30mm, 28 (6.0%) of 464 women with spontaneous preterm birth were identified. The number needed to screen to prevent one case of preterm birth was 618 in nulliparous women and 1417 for low-risk multiparous women (40% treatment effect, cut-off 30mm). ConclusionIn women at low risk of preterm birth, CL predicts spontaneous preterm birth. However, its isolated use as a screening tool has limited value due to low sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available