4.5 Article

Evidence for a short period of hydrologic activity in Newton crater, Mars, near the Hesperian-Amazonian transition

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
Volume 118, Issue 5, Pages 1082-1093

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgre.20088

Keywords

Mars; water; alluvial fan; climate; sediment; channel

Funding

  1. NASA Postdoctoral Program at the Ames Research Center
  2. NASA's Mars Data Analysis Program
  3. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hesperian/Amazonian-aged valleys and alluvial fans distributed in regional clusters throughout the southern middle- to low-latitudes were formed during a period of fluvial runoff and erosion which acted over a smaller spatial and temporal scale than the older, classical Martian valley networks dated to the Noachian-Hesperian boundary. In order to explore the potential sources of water which formed these younger valleys, we calculated the expected sediment transport and water discharge rates for a valley and alluvial fan located in Newton crater (40 degrees S, -159 degrees E) over a wide range of water-filled channel depths and sediment grain sizes in order to constrain the formation timescale and required water volume. Depending on the depth of the water-filled channel within the valley, the alluvial fan was likely emplaced over approximate to 0.1 to approximate to 10years of fluvial activity involving between 1.8 and 5.7km (3) of water. These results imply water runoff rates of between 1 and 10cm/d over a typical 300km(2) drainage area. Possible processes for delivering water to these drainages include high obliquity snowpack melting via volcanism or impacts resulting in either scattered, local to regional melting events or a brief global warming event. An extended, perhaps episodic, period of fluvial activity lasting hundreds of years driven by insolation-induced melting of high obliquity snowpacks is another possibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available