Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports

A tool to assess the quality of a meta-analysis

(2013) Julian P.T. Higgins et al.   Research Synthesis Methods

Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology

(2011) Luis H. Braga et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity?

(2010) Bernadette G Dijkman et al.   JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews

(2009) Khalid Al Faleh et al.   BMC Pediatrics

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review

(2009) Andreas Lundh et al.   CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS

Systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluations and quality-of-life studies related to generalized anxiety disorder

(2009) Basil G. Bereza et al.   CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS

A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in fetal medicine

(2009) Ellen M. Knox et al.   European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy

(2009) Anne M. Moseley et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: Differences in methodological quality and conclusions

(2008) Anders W Jørgensen et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology