Journal
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS
Volume 1, Issue 3-4, Pages 308-315Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.26
Keywords
graphical display; diagnostic meta-analysis; clinical interpretation
Funding
- MRC [G0800472]
- MRC [G0800472] Funding Source: UKRI
- Medical Research Council [G0800472] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Understanding diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) data, especially meta-analysis of this information, can be challenging for researchers and clinicians. The use of plots of receiver-operator curve (ROC) space showing individual studies and summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy has become common but can be difficult to interpret. The assessment of heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity across studies can be particularly difficult. In this paper, we review the key concepts of assessing DTA, starting at the level of individual studies and progressing to the setting of research synthesis. We explore the standard displays of this information and then propose and explain an alternative approach to summarizing key data. These 'cross-hairs' plots display the individual studies in ROC space with paired confidence intervals representing sensitivity and specificity, and allow for the results of meta-analysis to be overlaid on the plot. We suggest that these plots are more easily interpreted, and are a more informative graphical form than common approaches. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available