4.3 Article

Effect of irrigation on yield parameters and antioxidant profiles of processing cherry tomato

Journal

CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 383-395

Publisher

VERSITA
DOI: 10.2478/s11535-013-0279-5

Keywords

Water supply; Carotenoids; Phenolics; Tocopherols; Processing cherry tomato

Categories

Funding

  1. Szent Istvan University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences [9910-3/2013/TUDPOL, KTIA_AIK_12-1-2012-0012]
  2. [TAMOP-4.2.1. B-11/2/KMR 2011-0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A two-year (2010 and 2011) open field experiment was conducted to study the effect of drip irrigation and seasonal variation on the yield parameters and main bioactive components, carotenoids (mainly all trans, cis lycopene, and beta-carotene), polyphenols (chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, rutin, naringin, etc.), and tocopherols of processing Strombolino F1 cherry tomatoes. The irrigated plants (STI) gave a higher marketable yield (61% and 101% respectively), and rain fed plants showed a yield loss. Water supply had a strong positive (R-2=0.98) effect on marketable yield in 2011, but weak (R-2=0.69) in 2010. In both years, the antioxidant concentration (all carotenoids, total polyphenols, tocopherols) showed a decrease with irrigation. Water supply affected the composition of carotenoids to a considerable extent. The optimum water supply treatment gave a lower proportion of lycopene than the rain fed control (STC) treatment. We observed significant negative correlation between rutin concentration and irrigation. The alpha-tocopherol concentration was significantly higher in STC treatments. Irrigation negatively influenced antioxidant concentrations of cherry tomato fruits, but higher yield could account for the concentration loss of individual fruits by higher antioxidant production per unit area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available