Cost effectiveness of personalized treatment in women with early breast cancer: the application of OncotypeDX and Adjuvant! Online to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in Austria
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cost effectiveness of personalized treatment in women with early breast cancer: the application of OncotypeDX and Adjuvant! Online to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in Austria
Authors
Keywords
21-Gene assay, Genetic testing, Adjuvant! Online, Cost effectiveness, Decision-analytic model, Discrete event simulation
Journal
SpringerPlus
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-12-01
DOI
10.1186/s40064-015-1440-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Lessons Learned from a Cross-Model Validation between a Discrete Event Simulation Model and a Cohort State-Transition Model for Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment
- (2015) Beate Jahn et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Systematic overview of cost–effectiveness thresholds in ten countries across four continents
- (2015) Ruth Schwarzer et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
- (2014) S Ward et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Utility of prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer practice: The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Consensus Statement†
- (2013) H. A. Azim et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
- (2013) E. Senkus et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) Josh J. Carlson et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility
- (2013) P. Sinn et al. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE
- Cost-Effectiveness of the 21-Gene Assay for Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early Breast Cancer
- (2013) Mike Paulden et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Concordance among gene expression-based predictors for ER-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen
- (2012) A. Prat et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer
- (2012) Mo Yang et al. CANCER
- Modeling Using Discrete Event Simulation
- (2012) Jonathan Karnon et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Modeling Good Research Practices—Overview
- (2012) J. Jaime Caro et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis
- (2012) Andrew H. Briggs et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- PRM16 Evaluation of Personalized Breast Cancer Test-Treatment Strategies - A Cross-Validation Study Between a Discrete-Event Simulation and a Markov Model
- (2012) B. Jahn et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6
- (2012) Andrew H. Briggs et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- St. Gallen 2011: Summary of the Consensus Discussion
- (2011) Michael Gnant et al. Breast Care
- Economic Evaluation of Genomic Test–Directed Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Lymph Node–Positive Breast Cancer
- (2011) Peter S. Hall et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Physician Survey of the Effect of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Results on Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Lymph Node–Positive, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
- (2011) Ruth Oratz et al. Journal of Oncology Practice
- Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX®) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03)
- (2010) Masahide Kondo et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Association Between the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Risk of Locoregional Recurrence in Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Results From NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20
- (2010) Eleftherios P. Mamounas et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Prospective Multicenter Study of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Medical Oncologist and Patient Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Selection
- (2010) Shelly S. Lo et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Recurrence Score-Guided Treatment Using a 21-Gene Assay in Early Breast Cancer
- (2010) D. T. Tsoi et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Economic Implications of 21-Gene Breast Cancer Risk Assay from the Perspective of an Israeli-Managed Health-Care Organization
- (2010) Shmuel H. Klang et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression profiling improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?
- (2009) GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Cost Effectiveness of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Anthracycline and Taxane Treatment
- (2009) Shelby D. Reed et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- The influence of a Gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions
- (2009) Leonard R. Henry et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?
- (2008) Juhi Asad et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started