4.6 Article

Dual-Hop Mixed RF-UOW Communication System: A PHY Security Analysis

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 55345-55360

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870344

Keywords

Amplify-and-forward; average secrecy capacity; dual-hop relaying; intercept probability; performance analysis; physical layer security; underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the secrecy performance of a dual-hop mixed radio-frequency/underwater optical wireless communication (RF-UOWC) system is investigated. The considered system consists of one single antenna source node (S) communicating with one destination node (D), considered as the legitimate receiver, through an amplify-and-forward relay node equipped with multiple antennas for reception. Specifically, the relay receives the incoming signal from S via an RF link, applies maximal-ratio combining technique, amplifies the output combined signal with either a fixed gain or variable gain, and then forwards it to the destination via an UOWC link. The transmission protocol is performed under the eavesdropper's attempt to overhear the RF link (i.e., S-R). We derive exact closed-form expressions for the system's average secrecy capacity and the intercept probability in terms of Meijer's G-function as well as the univariate and bivariate Fox's H-functions. A complexity analysis is also performed to analyze the evaluation time of the derived analytical formulas as well as Monte Carlo simulation method complexity. Our derived analytical formulas present an efficient tool to depict the impact of some system and channel parameters on the secrecy performance, namely, the number of relay antennas, the number of eavesdropping nodes, relay gain, fading severity of RF links, and water turbulence severity of the UOWC link.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available