4.8 Review

Impact of MAPK pathway activation in BRAF(V600) melanoma on T cell and dendritic cell function

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00346

Keywords

melanoma; dendritic cell; T cell; BRAF; MEK; immunotherapy; kinase inhibitor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Constitutive upregulation of the MAPK pathway by a BRAFv600 mutation occurs in about half of melanomas. This leads to increased oncogenic properties such as tumor cell invasion, metastatic potential, and resistance to apoptosis. Blockade of the MAPK pathway with highly specific kinase inhibitors induces unprecedented tumor response rates in patients with advanced BRAFv600 mutant melanoma. Immune checkpoint blockade with monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxicT-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programed death-l/PD-L1 has also demonstrated striking anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced melanoma. Tumor responses are likely limited by multiple additional layers of immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment.There is emerging preclinical and clinical evidence suggesting that MARK inhibition has a beneficial effect on the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, providing a strong rationale for combined immunotherapy and MARK pathway inhibition in melanoma.The T cell response has been the main focus in the studies reported to date. Since dendritic cells (DCs) are important in the induction of tumor-specific T cell responses, the impact of MARK pathway activation in melanoma on DC function is critical for the melanoma directed immune response. BRAF V600E melanoma cells modulate DCs through the MARK pathway because its blockade in melanoma cells can reverse suppression of DC function. As both MEK/B RAF inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade have recently taken center stage in the treatment of melanoma, a deeper understanding of how MARK pathway inhibition affects the tumor immune response is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available