4.5 Article

Association of smoking with intraocular pressure in middle-aged and older Japanese residents

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 100-107

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12199-013-0359-1

Keywords

Intraocular pressure; Smoking; Epidemiology; Ocular hypertension; Glaucoma

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [22790570]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25560340, 22790570] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To clarify whether smoking was associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and to evaluate the interrelationship among IOP, blood viscosity, and smoking. This cross-sectional study analyzed health examination data obtained between 2001 and 2004 from 1113 individuals (829 men and 284 women), ranging in age from 28 to 79 years, who had not undergone any ocular surgery or medical treatment for hypertension, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma. Multiple-regression analysis showed that systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), and number of cigarettes smoked per day had a significantly positive association with IOP in men (P < 0.05). In women also, SBP, DBP, and BMI were positively related to IOP (P < 0.05). On the contrary, age had a significant negative association with IOP in both sexes (P < 0.01). Analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the adjusted mean IOP and the multivariate odds ratios for IOP increased with increasing cigarette consumption in men (P for trend = 0.01 and 0.06, respectively). Analysis of covariance found that smoking was significantly associated with both high IOP and high hematocrit in men (P for trend < 0.05); however, the adjusted mean IOP values were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, regardless of the hematocrit level. The results of this study suggested that the IOP level may be substantially affected by smoking habit in middle-aged and older Japanese men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available