4.1 Article

Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures

Journal

MARINE BIODIVERSITY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 203-211

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-014-0201-z

Keywords

Bioengineering; Intertidal; Mussel; Mytilus; Wave exposure

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  4. Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE)
  5. University of Naples

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mussels often act as ecosystem engineers in rocky intertidal habitats, favoring the occurrence of many small invertebrates by increasing habitat complexity and improving local environmental conditions. This study tests the hypothesis that invertebrate assemblages from intertidal mussel beds differ between wave-sheltered and wave-exposed habitats. To this aim, we surveyed exposed and sheltered sites spanning 350 km of coastline in Nova Scotia, Canada. We identified all invertebrates and measured their abundance in replicate quadrats that were fully covered by mussels. In total, we found 50 invertebrate taxa living in these mussel beds. Multivariate analyses revealed that the composition of invertebrate assemblages differed significantly between both habitat types. Exposed habitats supported a greater species richness, and the species that mainly explained the compositional difference between both environments were more abundant in exposed ones. Assemblages were taxonomically dominated by arthropods, annelids, and molluscs and numerically dominated by tubificid oligochaetes regardless of exposure. Our results suggest that exposed habitats may favor the occurrence of filter-feeders, such as barnacles, and sheltered habitats the occurrence of predators, such as small crabs and sea stars, in intertidal mussel beds from the NW Atlantic coast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available