Should comparative effectiveness research ignore industry-funded data?
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Should comparative effectiveness research ignore industry-funded data?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 317-320
Publisher
Future Medicine Ltd
Online
2014-10-02
DOI
10.2217/cer.14.31
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza
- (2014) H. M. Krumholz BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Financial Conflicts of Interest and Reporting Bias Regarding the Association between Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
- (2014) Maira Bes-Rastrollo et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2013) Florence T. Bourgeois ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research
- (2013) Anne-Sophie Jannot et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices
- (2013) Vinay Prasad et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- The Effects of Industry Sponsorship on Comparator Selection in Trial Registrations for Neuropsychiatric Conditions in Children
- (2013) Adam G. Dunn et al. PLoS One
- The automation of systematic reviews
- (2013) G. Tsafnat et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome
- (2013) Lisa Bero JAMA Internal Medicine
- The Role and Impact of Research Agendas on the Comparative-Effectiveness Research Among Antihyperlipidemics
- (2012) A G Dunn et al. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- Characteristics of Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010
- (2012) Robert M. Califf JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2012) Florence T. Bourgeois et al. PLoS One
- Learning from Hackers: Open-Source Clinical Trials
- (2012) A. G. Dunn et al. Science Translational Medicine
- The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience
- (2012) Peter Doshi et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The long Avandia endgame
- (2011) Asher Mullard LANCET
- Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes
- (2010) Isabelle Boutron JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- WHO's budgetary allocations and burden of disease: a comparative analysis
- (2008) David Stuckler et al. LANCET
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started