4.1 Article

The durability of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal

CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 1905-1911

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S72396

Keywords

type 2 diabetes mellitus; sitagliptin; oral antidiabetic drugs; dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To evaluate the durability of sitagliptin and to assess changes in clinical chronic complications following sitagliptin monotherapy for 48 months in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Subjects and methods: We enrolled 76 drug-naIve patients (40 women and 36 men; mean age: 71.3 +/- 11.7 years) with T2DM who received 25-100 mg of sitagliptin therapy from an outpatient clinic. The observational period for each patient was >48 months, beginning at the time sitagliptin therapy was initiated. The following were measured or performed at the beginning of each year: body mass index; serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein; triglyceride levels; creatinine (Cr) levels; urine albumin and urine Cr; nonmydriatic fundusgraphy; and semiquantified neuropathy. The fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was measured every 3-6 months. Results: The change in HbA(1c) was significantly reduced after 6 months of therapy (7.1%+/- 0.8% to 6.3%+/- 0.2%). No changes in fasting plasma glucose, Cr, serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, body mass index, and microvascular complications were apparent. Using repeated measures to test the sequential changes in HbA(1c) from month 6 to month 48, the test of within-subjects effect was not significant (P=0.34). Conclusion: Sitagliptin has a durable effect and stabilizes microvascular complication progression in elderly patients. This study can provide useful data for clinicians and health care professionals using sitagliptin monotherapy in the treatment of elderly patients with T2DM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available