4.5 Article

High diversity in an urban habitat: are some animal assemblages resilient to long-term anthropogenic change?

Journal

URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 449-463

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-014-0406-8

Keywords

Urban ecosystem; Long term study; Formicidae; Disturbance; Invasive species

Funding

  1. NASA Biodiversity Grant [ROSES-NNX09AK22G]
  2. USGS grant
  3. NSF-CAREER grant [09533390]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1136717] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Research On Learning
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1319293] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urbanization is thought to lead to the loss of biodiversity both because of habitat disturbance and the increased abundance of invasive species. However, most studies of biodiversity in cities are conducted on a short time scale, usually less than 3 years, and so miss the long-term dynamics of communities inhabiting these ecosystems. Here we use a study performed in the early 70's on North Carolina State University (Raleigh, USA) as a baseline to evaluate the long term effects of disturbance and introduced species on native ant communities. Ant species were sampled almost 40 years later using a variety of sampling techniques in order to maximize species collection. Our results show that while the number of exotic species increased, including three major invasive ants, native ant species richness remained high. Furthermore, our survey was able to add several new records for the area considered, in comparison of the 70's study, for a total of 89 species known from NCSU campus. After comparison with other studies, our results represent one of the most species-rich urban environments monitored and thus open encouraging perspective on how urban ecosystems could contribute to the preservation of the biodiversity of small-bodies organisms such as ants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available