4.7 Article

Using a pharmacogenomic algorithm to guide the treatment of depression

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/tp.2012.99

Keywords

depression; genomics; personalized medicine; pharmacogenomics; psychiatric treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Mayo Clinic Discovery Translation Grant
  2. Samuel C Johnson Genomics of Addiction Program
  3. AssureRX Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of utilizing a pharmacogenomic testing report to guide the selection and dosing of psychotropic medications in an outpatient psychiatric practice. The non-randomized, open label, prospective cohort study was conducted from September 2009 to July 2010. In the first cohort, depressed patients were treated without the benefit of pharmacogenomic testing (the unguided group). A DNA sample was obtained from patients in the unguided group, but the results were not shared with either the physicians or patients until the end of the 8-week study period. In the second cohort (the guided group), testing results were provided at the beginning of the 8-week treatment period. Depression ratings were collected at baseline and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rated (QIDS-C16) and the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17). Clinician and patient satisfaction was also assessed. The reduction in depressive symptoms achieved within the guided treatment group was greater than the reduction of depressive symptoms in the unguided treatment group using either the QIDS-C16 (P = 0.002) or HAM-D17 (P = 0.04). We concluded that a rapidly available pharmacogenomic interpretive report provided clinical guidance that was associated with improved clinical outcomes for depressed patients treated in an outpatient psychiatric clinic setting. Translational Psychiatry (2012) 2, e172; doi:10.1038/tp.2012.99; published online 16 October 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available