4.2 Article

Macronutrients Absorption and Surface Runoff Losses Under Different Fertilizer Treatments in Sugarcane Field

Journal

SUGAR TECH
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 255-260

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-012-0160-2

Keywords

Micronutrients; Absorption; Runoff losses; Vinasse

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science & Technology Support Program Project, China [2007BAD30B03]
  2. International Scientific Exchange Program projects [2008DFA30600, 2009DFA30820]
  3. Guangxi R & D Research Program projects [1123008-1, 0815011]
  4. Guangxi Special Fund for Environmental Protection, China [81]
  5. Youth Project of Science in Guangxi, China [0728028]
  6. Project of Guangxi Science Energy Program, China [0815011-6-1-17]
  7. Key Program of Guangxi Agricultural Bureau, China [NK200906]
  8. Development Project of GXAAS, China [201004Z]
  9. Fundamental Research Project of GXAAS, China [200934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present experiment was conducted to assess the soil and plant nutrient content and their uptake by sugarcane plants after applying vinasse as liquid fertilizer. The impact of vinasse application on environment and risk assessment of its application has also been studied. Three treatments used in the experiment were CK1 (no fertilizer + 105.0 t/ha water), CK2 (181.7, 450.0 and 1,327.5 kg/ha of N, P2O5 and K2O, respectively + 105.0 t/ha water) and vinasse (75.0 t/ha vinasse + 166.7 kg/ha P2O5 + 30.0 t/ha water). The vinasse treatment decreased N content and increased P and K content in sugarcane plants compared to controls. It also enhanced total P and K content in soil, and decreased the surface runoff losses for N, P and K. In conclusion, the use of vinasse as liquid fertilizer contributed enough P and K for the growth and development of sugarcane crop, improved the soil organic matter content and reduced the N, P and K losses through surface runoff water by enhancing the nutrient retention capacity of the soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available