3.9 Article

The Association Between Skull Bone Fractures and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 1611-1614

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823a8a60

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; Mortality; Risk factors; Skull bone fracture; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Subdural hemorrhage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In traumatic brain injury (TBI), computed tomography (CT) provides a good assessment of anatomic pathologic findings and the prognostic value of CT characteristics has been well discussed. However, few studies have focused on skull bone fracture and its clinical prognostic importance. Hence, this study aims to evaluate the effects of skull bone fracture on patients with severe TBI admitted to the emergency unit. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients with isolated severe TBI admitted to the emergency unit of a university hospital from July 2003 to June 2008. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of skull bone fracture identified by the CT scan while in the emergency unit. Mann-Whitney U test and a Student's t test were used to identify the differences between the two groups, whereas logistic regression was applied to determine any significant differences found in the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 197 patients were signed up in our study. Based on the presence of skull bone fracture on CT scan at emergency department, 92 patients (46.7%) comprised the skull bone fracture group and 59 patients (64.1%) of these died. One hundred five patients (53.3%) comprised the nonskull bone fracture group, of which 33 patients (31.4%) died. There is significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.004). Conclusion: This study shows that skull bone fracture is a mortality risk factor for patients with isolated severe blunt TBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available