4.3 Article

Effect of the lump size on methane desorption from anthracite

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 337-346

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.019

Keywords

Desorption characteristics; Lump anthracite size; Mercury porosimetry; Fracture volume; Coal matrix

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51174141, 50974093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anthracite fracture and pore structure of four different sized coal samples were measured using a light microscope and mercury porosimetry, respectively. The desorption kinetics of methane, at three different pressures, were also studied on six size fractions of coal samples using a volumetric experimental apparatus. The effect of lump size on methane desorption from anthracite combined with its pore structure was further discussed. The results showed that (1) for the lump coals, three pressure regimes in the process of mercury injection are indicated by distinct values of the fractal dimension; in order of increasing pressure, these correspond to cleat penetration, pore penetration, and coal matrix compressibility; (2) When the lump coal size drops below the coal matrix size, the pore volume and average pore size increase with decreasing grain size. When the lump size exceeds the coal matrix size, pore-fracture structural characteristics of anthracite, such as cleat aperture, cleat porosity, the matrix average pore size, and matrix porosity are basically invariant; (3) with increasing lump size, the desorption time constant changes according to positive exponential rules, eventually obtaining a stable value after the lump size fraction of 70-75 mm; the ultimate desorption ratio, initial desorption rate, attenuation index of the desorption rate and gas diffusivity decrease significantly and then change little when the lump size exceeds the coal matrix size. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available