4.4 Article

Cosmic ray anomalies from the MSSM?

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2011)064

Keywords

Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. NSF
  3. BMBF [05H09PDE]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-FG02-91ER40684]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent positron excess in cosmic rays (CR) observed by the PAMELA satellite may be a signal for dark matter (DM) annihilation. When these measurements are combined with those from FERMI on the total (e(+) + e(-)) flux and from PAMELA itself on the (p) over bar /p ratio, these and other results are difficult to reconcile with traditional models of DM, including the conventional mSUGRA version of Supersymmetry even if boosts as large as 10(3-4) are allowed. In this paper, we combine the results of a previously obtained scan over a more general 19-parameter subspace of the MSSM with a corresponding scan over astrophysical parameters that describe the propagation of CR. We then ascertain whether or not a good fit to this CR data can be obtained with relatively small boost factors while simultaneously satisfying the additional constraints arising from gamma ray data. We find that a specific subclass of MSSM models where the LSP is mostly pure bino and annihilates almost exclusively into tau pairs comes very close to satisfying these requirements. The lightest (tau) over tilde in this set of models is found to be relatively close in mass to the LSP and is in some cases the nLSP. These models lead to a significant improvement in the overall fit to the data by an amount Delta chi(2) similar to 1/dof in comparison to the best fit without Supersymmetry while employing boosts similar to 100. The implications of these models for future experiments are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available