4.4 Article

F-theory, GUTs, and the weak scale

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/079

Keywords

Supersymmetry Breaking; F-Theory; Intersecting branes models; GUT

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-0244821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we study a deformation of gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking in a class of local F-theory GUT models where the scale of supersymmetry breaking determines the value of the mu term. Geometrically correlating these two scales constrains the soft SUSY breaking parameters of the MSSM. In this scenario, the hidden SUSY breaking sector involves an anomalous U(1) Peccei-Quinn symmetry which forbids bare mu and B mu terms. This sector typically breaks supersymmetry at the desired range of energy scales through a simple stringy hybrid of a Fayet and Polonyi model. A variant of the Giudice-Masiero mechanism generates the value mu similar to 10(2) - 10(3) GeV when the hidden sector scale of supersymmetry breaking is root F similar to 10(8.5) GeV. Further, the B mu problem is solved due to the mild hierarchy between the GUT scale and Planck scale. These models relate SUSY breaking with the QCD axion, and solve the strong CP problem through an axion with decay constant f(a) similar to M-GUT.mu/Lambda, where Lambda similar to 10(5) GeV is the characteristic scale of gaugino mass unification in gauge mediated models, and the ratio mu/Lambda similar to M-GUT/M-pl similar to 10(-3). We find f(a) similar to 10(12) GeV, which is near the high end of the phenomenologically viable window. Here, the axino is the goldstino mode which is eaten by the gravitino. The gravitino is the LSP with a mass of about 10(1) - 10(2) MeV, and a bino-like neutralino is (typically) the NLSP with mass of about 10(2) - 10(3) GeV. Compatibility with electroweak symmetry breaking also determines the value of tan beta similar to 30 +/- 7.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available