4.5 Article

The January 2015 outburst of a red nova in M31

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 578, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526564

Keywords

novae; cataclysmic variables

Funding

  1. European Social Fund [BG051 PO001-3.3.06-0057]
  2. Institute of Astronomy and Rozhen National Astronomical Observatory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  3. Hungarian Research [OTKA K-109276, OTKA K-113117]
  4. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [LP2012-31]
  5. ESA PECS [4000110889/14/NL/NDe. E.A.B]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-02-00759]
  7. Russian Scientific Foundation [N14-5000043]
  8. Kazan Federal University
  9. NSF [AST1009566]
  10. [RVO:67985815]
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1009566] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. M31N 2015-01a (or M31LRN 2015) is a red nova that erupted in January 2015 - the first event of this kind observed in M31 since 1988. Very few similar events have been confirmed as of 2015. Most of them are considered to be products of stellar mergers. Aims. Results of an extensive optical monitoring of the transient in the period January-March 2015 are presented. Methods. Eight optical telescopes were used for imaging. Spectra were obtained on the Large Altazimuth Telescope (BTA), the Gran Telecsopio Canarias (GTC) and the Rozhen 2 m telescope. Results. We present a highly accurate 70 d light curve and astrometry with a 0.05 uncertainty. The colour indices reached a minimum of 2-3 d before peak brightness and rapidly increased afterwards. The spectral type changed from F5I to F0I in 6 d before the maximum and then to K3I in the next 30 d. The luminosity of the transient was estimated to be 8.7(-2.2)(+3.3)x10(5) L-circle dot during the optical maximum. Conclusions. Both the photometric and the spectroscopic results confirm that the object is a red nova, similar to V838 Monocerotis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available