4.5 Article

Class AAA LED-Based Solar Simulator for Steady-State Measurements and Light Soaking

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 1282-1287

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2335738

Keywords

Accelerated light soaking; a-Si:H; solar simulator; LED; light-induced degradation; solar cell; Staebler-Wronski effect; thin-film silicon

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy [SI/500750-01]
  2. Competence Center Energy and Mobility and Swisselectric Research (DURSOL Project)
  3. FP7 Project Fast Track - European Commission [283501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent improvements in light-emitting diode (LED) technology has allowed for the use of LEDs for solar simulators with excellent characteristics. In this paper, we present a solar simulator prototype fully based on LEDs. Our prototype has been designed specifically for light soaking and current-voltage (I(V)) measurements of amorphous silicon solar cells. With 11 different LED types, the spectrum from 400 to 750 nm can be adapted to any reference spectrum-such as AM1.5g-with a spectral match corresponding to class A+ or better. The densely packed LEDs provide power densities equivalent to 4 suns for AM1.5g or 5 suns with all LEDs at full power with no concentrator optics. The concept of modular LED blocks and electronics guarantees good uniformity and easy up-scalability. Instead of cost-intensive LED drivers, low-cost power supplies were used with current control, including a feedback loop on in-house developed electronics. This prototype satisfies the highest classifications (better than AAA from 400 to 750 nm) with an illuminated area of 18 cm x 18 cm. For a broader spectrum, the spectral range could be extended by using other types of LEDs or by adding halogen lamps. The space required for this can be saved by using LEDs with higher power or by reducing the maximum light intensity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available