4.2 Article

Structural correlates of motor adaptation deficits in patients with acute focal lesions of the cerebellum

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 232, Issue 9, Pages 2847-2857

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3956-3

Keywords

Motor adaptation; Acute cerebellar stroke; Force field; Visuomotor rotation; Superior hand area

Categories

Funding

  1. Cerebellar-Cortical Control: Cells, Circuits, Computation and Clinic (C7) Marie Curie Initial Training Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of cerebellar patients employing modern lesion-symptom mapping techniques have provided valuable insights into the contribution of the cerebellum to motor adaptation. In patients with chronic focal lesions of the cerebellum, the process of adapting reaching movements to force field (FF) and visuomotor rotation (VM) perturbations relies on different anatomical structures located primarily within the territory of the superior hand area. By contrast, results within the territory of the inferior hand area are less consistent. Compensatory mechanisms may have masked the contribution of the inferior hand area. To test this hypothesis, reaching adaptation to FF and VM perturbations was investigated in 24 patients with acute and subacute lesions of the cerebellum. High-resolution magnetic resonance images were acquired to perform voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). VLSM confirmed that distinct and only partially overlapping areas located primarily within the territory of the superior hand area were crucial for adaptation to FF and VM. More specifically, current results add to previous findings that lobule V is of particular importance in FF adaptation, whereas lobule VI plays a more important role in VM adaptation. No clear evidence for a contribution of the inferior hand area to either task was found. Reach adaptation appears to depend primarily on the superior hand area within the cerebellum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available