4.5 Article

Small molecule phosphorescent probes for O2 imaging in 3D tissue models

Journal

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 853-866

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3bm60272a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [12/TIDA/B2413]
  2. European Commission [FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-304842-2]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [12/TIDA/B2413] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring of oxygenation is important for physiological experiments investigating the growth, differentiation and function of individual cells in 3D tissue models. Phosphorescence based O-2 sensing and imaging potentially allow this task; however, current probes do not provide the desired bio-distribution and analytical performance. We present several new cell-penetrating phosphorescent conjugates of a Pt(II)-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) porphine (PtPFPP) dye produced by click-modification with thiols, and perform their evaluation as O-2 imaging probes for 3D tissue models. The hydrophilic glucose (Pt-Glc) and galactose (Pt-Gal) conjugates demonstrated minimal aggregation and self-quenching in aqueous media, and efficient in-depth staining of different cell types and multi-cellular aggregates at working concentrations <= 10 mu M. The Pt-Glc probe was applied in high-resolution phosphorescence lifetime based O-2 imaging (PLIM) in multi-cellular spheroids of cancer cells (PC12), primary neural cells (neurospheres) and slices of brain tissue, where it showed good analytical performance, minimal effects on cell viability and appropriate responses to O-2 with phosphorescence lifetimes changing from 20 mu s in air-saturated to 57 mu s under deoxygenated conditions. In contrast, mono-and tetra-substituted oligoarginine conjugates of PtPFPP showed marked aggregation and unstable photophysical properties precluding their use as O-2 sensing probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available