4.6 Article

Assessing the Feasibility of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Irrigation under Uncertainty

Journal

WATER
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 2748-2769

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w6092748

Keywords

managed aquifer recharge; feasibility; cost-benefit analysis; break-even analysis; uncertainty

Funding

  1. Australian Government's Endeavour Scholarships and Fellowships programme, National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (NCGRT), Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additional storage of water is a potential option to meet future water supply goals. Financial comparisons are needed to improve decision making about whether to store water in surface reservoirs or below ground, using managed aquifer recharge (MAR). In some places, the results of cost-benefit analysis show that MAR is financially superior to surface storage. However, uncertainty often exists as to whether MAR systems will remain operationally effective and profitable in the future, because the profitability of MAR is dependent on many uncertain technical and financial variables. This paper introduces a method to assess the financial feasibility of MAR under uncertainty. We assess such uncertainties by identification of cross-over points in break-even analysis. Cross-over points are the thresholds where MAR and surface storage have equal financial returns. Such thresholds can be interpreted as a set of minimum requirements beyond which an investment in MAR may no longer be worthwhile. Checking that these thresholds are satisfied can improve confidence in decision making. Our suggested approach can also be used to identify areas that may not be suitable for MAR, thereby avoiding expensive hydrogeological and geophysical investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management

Thorsten Arnold, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Tuomas J. Lahtinen, R. Willem Vervoort

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2020)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Reflective communication to improve problem-solving pathways: Key issues illustrated for an integrated environmental modelling case study

Fateme Zare, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Anthony J. Jakeman, Oveis Torabi

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

Giving Legs to Handprint Thinking: Foundations for Evaluating the Good We Do

Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Suvi Sojamo, Miina Porkka, Dieter Gerten, Mika Jalava, Leena Lankoski, Elina Lehikoinen, Michael Lettenmeier, Stephan Pfister, Kirsi Usva, Yoshihide Wada, Matti Kummu

EARTHS FUTURE (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

Future Transboundary Water Stress and Its Drivers Under Climate Change: A Global Study

Hafsa Ahmed Munia, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Yoshihide Wada, Ted Veldkamp, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu

EARTHS FUTURE (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

What is Policy Analytics? An Exploration of 5 Years of Environmental Management Applications

Yves Meinard, Olivier Barreteau, Christophe Boschet, Katherine A. Daniell, Nils Ferrand, Sabine Girard, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Emeline Hassenforder, Matthew Lord, Myriam Merad, Ehsan Nabavi, Claire Petitjean, Irene Pluchinotta, Juliette Rouchier, Alexis Tsoukias, Pascale Zarate

Summary: This paper presents the development and applications of the policy analytics concept, emphasizing key properties such as demand-orientedness, performativity, normative transparency, and data meaningfulness. These properties are crucial in environmental policy design and decision-making.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support

Saman Razavi, Anthony Jakeman, Andrea Saltelli, Clementine Prieur, Bertrand Iooss, Emanuele Borgonovo, Elmar Plischke, Samuele Lo Piano, Takuya Iwanaga, William Becker, Stefano Tarantola, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, John Jakeman, Hoshin Gupta, Nicola Melillo, Giovanni Rabitti, Vincent Chabridon, Qingyun Duan, Xifu Sun, Stefan Smith, Razi Sheikholeslami, Nasim Hosseini, Masoud Asadzadeh, Arnald Puy, Sergei Kucherenko, Holger R. Maier

Summary: Sensitivity analysis is becoming an essential part of mathematical modeling, with untapped potential benefits for both mechanistic and data-driven modeling as well as decision making. This perspective paper revisits the current status of SA and outlines research challenges in various areas, emphasizing the need for structuring and standardizing SA as a discipline, tapping into its potential for systems modeling, addressing computational burdens, progressing SA in the context of machine learning, clarifying its relationship with uncertainty quantification, and evolving its use in decision making. An outlook for the future of SA is provided to better serve science and society.

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Property-based Sensitivity Analysis: An approach to identify model implementation and integration errors

Takuya Iwanaga, Xifu Sun, Qian Wang, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Barry F. W. Croke, Joel Rahman, Anthony J. Jakeman

Summary: Diagnostic testing often uses sensitivity analysis to assess model behavior correctness. Sensitivity analysis can provide evidence of expected conceptual relationships between model factors through examining parameter sensitivities. Unexpected results may indicate issues to be corrected, and the PbSA approach is scalable and can complement existing testing practices.

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Considering scale within optimization procedures for water management decisions: Balancing environmental flows and human needs

Diana Derepasko, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Avril C. Horne, Martin Volk

Summary: The key issue in optimization model development involves choosing spatial and temporal scales that represent the system. Scale is determined by the management problem, constrained by data availability, computational, and model capabilities. There is an inherent trade-off between problem perception and available modeling capability, which can be resolved by obtaining necessary data or tailoring analysis to available data.

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2021)

Article Engineering, Civil

A formative and self-reflective approach to monitoring and evaluation of interdisciplinary team research: An integrated water resource modelling application in Australia

Fateme Zare, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Sondoss ElSawah, Barry Croke, Baihua Fu, Takuya Iwanaga, Wendy Merritt, Daniel Partington, Jenifer Ticehurst, Anthony J. Jakeman

Summary: Recent literature highlights the importance of monitoring and evaluating the problem-solving process itself, especially in interdisciplinary team settings. By reflecting on decisions, reasons, influences, and effects, this evaluation can improve stakeholder and researcher learning. A formative, self-reflective M&E process was designed and successfully applied to an integrated assessment and modeling project in Australia, leading to improved project adaptability and effectiveness.

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Assessing the predictive impact of factor fixing with an adaptive uncertainty-based approach

Qian Wang, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, John D. Jakeman, Tao Yang, Takuya Iwanaga, Barry Croke, Anthony J. Jakeman

Summary: Despite the widespread use of factor fixing in environmental modeling, its impact on model predictions has been overlooked. This study proposes an adaptive method for investigating the effect of factor fixing and demonstrates that it can lead to unexpected large errors in model results.

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2022)

Article Water Resources

Scenarios of water extremes: Framing ways forward for wicked problems

Hannah Kosow, Sabrina Kirschke, Dietrich Borchardt, Johannes Cullmann, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, David M. Hannah, Simon Schaub, Jale Tosun

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

A Decision-Relevant Factor-Fixing Framework: Application to Uncertainty Analysis of a High-Dimensional Water Quality Model

Qian Wang, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, John D. Jakeman, Frederick R. Bennett, Barry F. W. Croke, Baihua Fu, Tao Yang, Anthony J. Jakeman

Summary: Factor Fixing (FF) is a common method for reducing model parameters to lower computational cost. However, there is a need to consider the effects of decision choices in the FF-UQ procedure on metrics of interest. Therefore, a new adaptive framework is proposed to guide the use of FF and increase confidence in the resulting dimension-reduced model.

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH (2023)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Hydrostreamer v1.0-improved streamflow predictions for local applications from an ensemble of downscaled global runoff products

Marko Kallio, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, Kirsi Virrantaus

Summary: Hydrostreamer is a software library aimed at improving the usability of existing runoff products by addressing the modifiable area unit problem, allowing non-experts to use it for analysis. By implementing advanced interpolation methods and providing vector-based routing, Hydrostreamer demonstrated comparable or improved performance in performance testing compared to observed data.

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT (2021)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages - a unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

Paul C. Astagneau, Guillaume Thirel, Olivier Delaigue, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Juraj Parajka, Claudia C. Brauer, Alberto Viglione, Wouter Buytaert, Keith J. Beven

Summary: This study examines the availability of open-source R packages containing hydrological models for hydrologists, highlighting the importance of comparing them from a user perspective in terms of philosophy, model characteristics and ease of use. The analysis of seven hydrological models integrated into these R packages reveals different modeling choices associated with each package, emphasizing various hydrological concepts. A synthesis of the package functionalities is conducted to inform the selection of packages based on specific needs, aiming to support more transferable and reusable methods and results for hydrological modelling in R.

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES (2021)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

A multi-model analysis of teleconnected crop yield variability in a range of cropping systems

Matias Heino, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Christoph Mueller, Toshichika Iizumi, Matti Kummu

EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS (2020)

No Data Available