4.2 Article

The role of mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation revisited

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 26-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.10.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEDSCAPE(R)
  2. Astellas(R)
  3. Rockpointe(R)
  4. Novartis(R)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since its regulatory approval in 1995, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has largely replaced azathioprine (AZA) as the anti-metabolite immunosuppressive of choice in kidney transplantation. While the initial industry-sponsored clinical trials suggested strong reductions in the incidence of acute rejection in the first six months post transplantation, long-term follow-up studies have failed to demonstrate a similar degree of benefit in overall graft and patient survival. In addition, several subsequent studies have raised questions on the potential attenuating effects of calcineurin inhibitor choice on MMF efficacy when compared to AZA. This review will revisit the question of whether the available evidence continues to support the superiority of MMF over AZA in kidney transplantation outcomes while comprehensively reviewing the available evidence from clinical trial data, systematic reviews, and registry studies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available