4.1 Article

Helminth fauna parasitizing Pimelodus pohli (Actinopterygii: Pimelodidae) from the upper Sao Francisco River, Brazil

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 375-382

Publisher

BRAZILIAN COLL VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612014067

Keywords

Parasites of endemic fish; helminth parasites of freshwater fish; parasite community

Funding

  1. CAPES [Edital 032/2010 - Parasitologia Basica]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The parasite fauna of catfish, Pimelodus pohli, from the Sao Francisco River Basin is presented. A total of 45 catfish from the upper Sao Francisco River (45 degrees 15'44 '' W 18 degrees 13'25 '' S), were examined from July 2009 to September 2011. Forty-three catfish (95.5%) were infected by at least one parasite species, with 885 parasite specimens being found, distributed across 17 species: Monogenea (Demidospermus uncusvalidus, Pavanelliella pavanellii, and Scleroductus sp.); Eucestoda (plerocercoids of Proteocephalidea); Digenea (metacercariae of Austrodiplostomum compactum, adults of Auriculostoma platense and Kalipharynx sp., and juvenile of Prosthenhystera obesa); Nematoda (larvae of Contracaecum sp., Hysterothylacium sp., Procamallanus pimelodus, Procamallanus sp., and unidentified of Cucullanidae, and adults of Cucullanus caballeroi, Philometra sp., and Procamallanus freitasi); and Acanthocephala (adults of Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi). Procamallanus freitasi and Scleroductus sp. were the taxa with the highest prevalence. Demidospermus uncusvalidus, P. freitasi, and Scleroductus sp. were the dominant species. The host's sex did not influence parasitic indexes; however, the total length of the catfish did appear to have some influence. The parasites, with except for P. obesa, were registered for the first time in P. pohli, as well as the occurrence of Kalipharynx sp. and C. caballeroi among pimelodid hosts from Sao Francisco River and South America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available