Women’s and communities’ views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Women’s and communities’ views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Authors
Keywords
Caesarean section, Educational interventions, Decision-aids, Birth method, Women’s views
Journal
Reproductive Health
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-07-24
DOI
10.1186/s12978-018-0570-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series
- (2018) Simon Lewin et al. Implementation Science
- How do informal information sources influence women’s decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
- (2018) Ruth A. Sanders et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care
- (2017) Adam G Elshaug et al. LANCET
- Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education
- (2017) Kathrin H. Stoll et al. Reproductive Health
- Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries
- (2016) FIGO Working Group on Challenges in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide
- (2016) Suellen Miller et al. LANCET
- DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso
- (2016) Charles Kaboré et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
- (2016) Ana Pilar Betrán et al. PLoS One
- Developing an Internet-Based Decision Aid for Women Choosing Between Vaginal Birth After Cesarean and Planned Repeat Cesarean
- (2015) Allison Shorten et al. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH
- The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
- (2015) Meghan A. Bohren et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
- (2015) Simon Lewin et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys
- (2015) Joshua P Vogel et al. Lancet Global Health
- Googling caesarean section: a survey on the quality of the information available on the Internet
- (2014) BTS Fioretti et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- What do popular Spanish women's magazines say about caesarean section? A 21-year survey
- (2014) MR Torloni et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Fatores associados à cesariana entre primíparas adolescentes no Brasil, 2011-2012
- (2014) Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama et al. Cadernos de Saude Publica
- Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods
- (2014) Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo et al. Implementation Science
- Internet information on birth options after caesarean compared to the RCOG patient information leaflet; a web survey
- (2014) Natalie Whitelaw et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Why do primigravidae request caesarean section in a normal pregnancy? A qualitative study in Iran
- (2013) I. Faisal et al. MIDWIFERY
- Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study
- (2012) JR Cook et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health
- (2012) JP Souza et al. BMC Medicine
- ‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)
- (2012) Ingela Lundgren et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2012) Marylène Dugas et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Maria Regina Torloni et al. PLoS One
- Expectations of pregnant women and partners concerning their participation in humanized births
- (2011) Joéli Fernanda Basso et al. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
- Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- (2010) A Mazzoni et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Obstetricians' attitudes to caesarean delivery on maternal request in Nigeria
- (2010) C. O. Chigbu et al. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08
- (2010) Pisake Lumbiganon et al. LANCET
- A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated ‘Next Birth After Caesarean’ antenatal clinic
- (2010) Sara David et al. Women and Birth
- Women’s views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study
- (2009) J Frost et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy
- (2009) Jill Milne et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Decision support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: A developmental study
- (2008) A. Farnworth et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started