4.7 Article

Crop Classification in a Heterogeneous Arable Landscape Using Uncalibrated UAV Data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs10081282

Keywords

consumer-grade camera; land cover; very high resolution (VHR); random forest (RF) classifier; object-based classification; pixel-based classification; small-scaled agricultural fields; texture; spatial feature

Funding

  1. University of Zurich Research Priority Program on 'Global Change and Biodiversity' (URPP GCB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land cover maps are indispensable for decision making, monitoring, and management in agricultural areas, but they are often only available after harvesting. To obtain a timely crop map of a small-scale arable landscape in the Swiss Plateau, we acquired uncalibrated, very high-resolution data, with a spatial resolution of 0.05 m and four spectral bands, using a consumer-grade camera on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in June 2015. We resampled the data to different spatial and spectral resolutions, and evaluated the method using textural features (first order statistics and mathematical morphology), a random forest classifier for best performance, as well as number and size of the structuring elements. Our main findings suggest the overall best performing data consisting of a spatial resolution of 0.5 m, three spectral bands (RGBred, green, and blue), and five different sizes of the structuring elements. The overall accuracy (OA) for the full set of crop classes based on a pixel-based classification is 66.7%. In case of a merged set of crops, the OA increases by similar to 7% (74.0%). For an object-based classification based on individual field parcels, the OA increases by similar to 20% (OA of 86.3% for the full set of crop classes, and 94.6% for the merged set, respectively). We conclude the use of UAV to be most relevant at 0.5 m spatial resolution in heterogeneous arable landscapes when used for crop classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available