4.7 Article

Earth Observation-Based Dwelling Detection Approaches in a Highly Complex Refugee Camp Environment - A Comparative Study

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 9277-9297

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/rs6109277

Keywords

feature extraction; object-based image analysis (OBIA); dwelling detection; population estimation; refugee camps; VHR data

Funding

  1. European Community [218802]
  2. project GARNET-E [242385]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For effective management of refugee camps or camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs) relief organizations need up-to-date information on the camp situation. In cases where detailed field assessments are not available, Earth observation (EO) data can provide important information to get a better overview about the general situation on the ground. In this study, different approaches for dwelling detection were tested using the example of a highly complex camp site in Somalia. On the basis of GeoEye-1 imagery, semi-automatic object-based and manual image analysis approaches were applied, compared and evaluated regarding their analysis results (absolute numbers, population estimation, spatial pattern), statistical correlations and production time. Although even the results of the visual image interpretation vary considerably between the interpreters, there is a similar pattern resulting from all methods, which shows same tendencies for dense and sparse populated areas. The statistical analyses revealed that all approaches have problems in the more complex areas, whereas there is a higher variance in manual interpretations with increasing complexity. The application of advanced rule sets in an object-based environment allowed a more consistent feature extraction in the area under investigation that can be obtained at a fraction of the time compared to visual image interpretation if large areas have to be observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available