4.7 Article

Using InSAR Coherence to Map Stand Age in a Boreal Forest

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 42-56

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/rs5010042

Keywords

Synthetic Aperture Radar; Canada; coherence; disturbance; repeat pass; Quebec; regeneration; stand age; succession; temporal decorrelation; UAVSAR

Funding

  1. NASA's Terrestrial Ecology program [WBS 281945.02.61.01.69]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. University of Maryland, College Park

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interferometric coherence parameter gamma estimates the degree of correlation between two Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images and can be influenced by vegetation structure. Here, we investigate the use of repeat-pass interferometric coherence gamma to map stand age, an important parameter for the study of carbon stocks and forest regeneration. In August 2009 NASA's L-band airborne sensor UAVSAR (Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar) acquired zero-baseline data over Quebec with temporal separation ranging between 45 min and 9 days. Our analysis focuses on a 66 km(2) managed boreal forest and addresses three questions: (i) Can coherence from L-band systems be used to model forest age? (ii) Are models sensitive to weather events and temporal baseline? and (iii) How is model accuracy impacted by the spatial scale of analysis? Linear regression models with 2-day baseline showed the best results and indicated an inverse relationship between gamma and stand age. Model accuracy improved at 5 ha scale (R-2 = 0.75, RMSE = 5.3) as compared to 1 ha (R-2 = 0.67, RMSE = 5.8). Our results indicate that coherence measurements from L-band repeat-pass systems can estimate forest age accurately and with no saturation. However, empirical model relationships and their accuracy are sensitive to weather events, temporal baseline, and spatial scale of analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available