4.7 Article

Acute Neonatal Infections 'Lock-In' a Suboptimal CD8+T Cell Repertoire with Impaired Recall Responses

Journal

PLOS PATHOGENS
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003572

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI 066096, AG20719]
  2. National Institute on Aging
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  4. NIH [1K99HD067290-01]
  5. Bowman Professorship in Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial infection during various stages of human development produces widely different clinical outcomes, yet the links between age-related changes in the immune compartment and functional immunity remain unclear. The ability of the immune system to respond to specific antigens and mediate protection in early life is closely correlated with the level of diversification of lymphocyte antigen receptors. We have previously shown that the neonatal primary CD8+ T cell response to replication competent virus is significantly constricted compared to the adult response. In the present study, we have analyzed the subsequent formation of neonatal memory CD8+ T cells and their response to secondary infectious challenge. In particular, we asked whether the less diverse CD8+ T cell clonotypes that are elicited by neonatal vaccination with replication competent virus are 'locked-in' to the adult memory T cell, and thus may compromise the strength of adult immunity. Here we report that neonatal memory CD8+ T cells mediate poor recall responses compared to adults and are comprised of a repertoire of lower avidity T cells. During a later infectious challenge the neonatal memory CD8+ T cells compete poorly with the fully diverse repertoire of naive adult CD8+ T cells and are outgrown by the adult primary response. This has important implications for the timing of vaccination in early life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available