4.6 Article

Efforts to Reprioritise the Agenda'' in China: British American Tobacco's Efforts to Influence Public Policy on Secondhand Smoke in China

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 1729-1736

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050251

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5R25 CA113710-02, R01 CA90791, R01 CA091021, R01 CA090791, R25 CA113710, R01 CA91021-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Each year, 540 million Chinese are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS), resulting in more than 100,000 deaths. Smoke-free policies have been demonstrated to decrease overall cigarette consumption, encourage smokers to quit, and protect the health of nonsmokers. However, restrictions on smoking in China remain limited and ineffective. Internal tobacco industry documents show that transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) have pursued a multifaceted strategy for undermining the adoption of restrictions on smoking in many countries. Methods and Findings To understand company activities in China related to SHS, we analyzed British American Tobacco's (BAT's) internal corporate documents produced in response to litigation against the major cigarette manufacturers to understand company activities in China related to SHS. BAT has carried out an extensive strategy to undermine the health policy agenda on SHS in China by attempting to divert public attention from SHS issues towards liver disease prevention, pushing the so-called resocialisation of smoking'' accommodation principles, and providing training'' for industry, public officials, and the media based on BAT's corporate agenda that SHS is an insignificant contributor to the larger issue of air pollution. Conclusions The public health community in China should be aware of the tactics previously used by TTCs, including efforts by the tobacco industry to co-opt prominent Chinese benevolent organizations, when seeking to enact stronger restrictions on smoking in public places.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available