4.3 Article

Movement patterns in leiopelmatid frogs: Insights into the locomotor repertoire of basal anurans

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 43-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.001

Keywords

Antipredator strategy; Locomotor behavior; Ascaphus; Leiopelma; Jumping; Walking

Funding

  1. Baker fund
  2. International travel fund
  3. Department of Biological Sciences
  4. Faculty fellowship leave program at Ohio University
  5. PBRF Fund of the Department of Zoology, University of Otago
  6. Faculty research funds from Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Movements and locomotor behaviour were studied in the most basal living frog family (Leiopelmatidae: Ascaphus+Leiopelmatidae), which includes two stream-dwelling species and several that have transitioned into terrestrial niches. These cryptic frogs remain immobile over 99.6% of the time above ground as they sit in wait of prey and only rarely use jumping to escape. Walking is their primary mode of locomotion. The two stream species, which are separated by deep time and extreme geographic distance, have nearly identical behavioural repertoires and locomotor performance, which included occasional jumping as a means to change foraging positions. The terrestrial species, one of which has become semi-arboreal, rarely jump in nature and rely on chemical and postural antipredator behaviours to avoid predation. If early frogs resembled leiopelmatids, they were not well versed in jumping. Locomotor behaviour and performance of leiopelmatid frogs do not support the hypothesis that frog jumping originally evolved primarily as a means to rapidly escape into water. Given the basal position of the leiopelmatids, the locomotor strategy of these cryptic, cold-adapted, belly-flopping anurans that usually walk may represent a successful initial step in the evolution of saltatorial locomotion in frogs. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available