4.1 Article

Concurrent Validity of the TIMP and the Bayley III Scales at 6 Weeks Corrected Age

Journal

PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 395-401

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31829db85b

Keywords

developmental disabilities/diagnosis; infant/premature; infant; motor skills disorders/diagnosis; neuropsychologic tests; newborn; predictive value of tests; reproducibility of results; risk; socioeconomic factors

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research [1 R01 HD050738-01A2]
  3. Harris Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Examine agreement between the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and the Bayley III. Methods: One hundred forty-five infants born at 29 to 34 weeks gestation with socioenvironmental risk factors were tested on the TIMP and Bayley III at 6 weeks corrected age (CA). Scores were correlated to assess convergence/divergence of content. Decision analysis using a cutoff of the mean on the Bayley Motor Composite and -0.5 and -1 SD from the mean on the TIMP assessed agreement on delay/nondelay. Results: The TIMP-Bayley Motor Composite correlation was 0.546, with Cognitive was 0.310, and with Language was 0.281. Nine percent of infants scored less than -1.0 SD on the TIMP, while no child scored less than -1 SD on the Bayley Motor scale (sensitivity, 31%). Conclusions: Convergent validity between the TIMP and the Bayley Motor scale was demonstrated, but no infant showed delay on any Bayley scale. The TIMP is preferred for early assessment of infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available