4.1 Article

Microbiological effects of an antiseptic mouthrinse in irradiated cancer patients

Journal

MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages C1036-C1042

Publisher

MEDICINA ORAL S L
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17234

Keywords

Mucositis; head-and-neck tumour; ratiotherapy; chlorhexidine; cetyl-pyridinium chloride; microbial

Funding

  1. Dentaid (Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain)
  2. University Complutense

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the microbiological effects of an antiseptic, non-alcohol based mouth-rinse containing chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride, in patients undergoing radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. Study Design: This was a parallel, double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial, including patients irradiated as part of the therapy of head-and-neck cancer, aged 18-75, with at least 10 teeth, and willing to sign an informed consent. Cancer patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments (test mouth-rinse or a placebo). Three visits were scheduled (baseline, 14 and 28 days). Microbiological findings were evaluated in tongue, mucosa and subgingival samples, by means of culture. Microbiological variables were assessed by means of the Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon and chi-square tests. Results: 70 patients were screened and 36 were included. The detection of Candida species in mucosa and tongue samples showed significant reductions in the test group. Total bacterial counts decreased in both groups from baseline to the 2-week visit, while minor changes occurred between 2 and 4 weeks ( effects on P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, C. rectus, E. corrodens). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the small sample size, this study suggests that the use of the tested mouth-rinse may lead to improvements in microbiological parameters in patients irradiated for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available