4.1 Article

Enhanced biodegradation of oily wastewater through nuclear irradiation mutation and statistical experimental methodology

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 301-311

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wrd.2015.106

Keywords

biodegradation; enzyme activity; mutation; optimization; response surface methodology

Funding

  1. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41030426]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [41202097, 41340004]
  3. '12th Five-Year Plan' Major National Science and Technology Projects [2011ZX05001-005-03, 2011ZX05004-005-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the improved biodegradation of crude oil in aqueous phase using mutant Dietzia sp. obtained by random mutagenesis of wild Dietzia sp. using Co-60-gamma irradiation. The mutants obtained were screened based on their degradation performance and the best mutant was selected for oil degradation optimization research. A four factor central composite design coupled with response surface methodology was applied to evaluate and optimize the important variables. A genetically stable mutant, designated as M22, was isolated and demonstrated significantly higher degradation efficiency (52.5%) of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) than the parental strain (28.2%) in liquid media after 14 days of incubation. Increased production of enzyme responsible for the degradation was achieved with the mutant species. Optimum conditions were determined to be pH 7.6, 0.20 g/L K2HPO4, 0.57 g/L NH4NO3, and 0.62 g/L yeast extract. Approximately 68.5% of TPH was experimentally degraded after 14 h of incubation under the optimum conditions, which agreed well with the model prediction. Gas chromatography-mass spectrum analysis showed that the mutant M22 could degrade a wide range of crude oil fractions, while optimization of culture conditions could be effective for increasing its strain's degrading ability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available