Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume 67, Issue 8, Pages 1849-1857
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-05-13
DOI
10.1002/asi.23515
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows
- (2014) Ehsan Mohammadi et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann et al. PLoS One
- Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
- (2013) Mike Thelwall et al. PLoS One
- Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties
- (2013) Fereshteh Didegah et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration
- (2012) Vicente P. Guerrero Bote et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices
- (2012) Matthew L. Wallace et al. PLoS One
- How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations
- (2012) Xin Shuai et al. PLoS One
- Citation increments between collaborating countries
- (2012) Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations
- (2011) Bárbara S. Lancho Barrantes et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications
- (2011) Ali Gazni et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
- (2011) Xuemei Li et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics
- (2010) Jonathan M. Levitt et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers
- (2010) Massimo Franceschet et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
- (2010) Henk F. Moed Journal of Informetrics
- Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science
- (2008) Jonathan M. Levitt et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology
- (2008) Nick Haslam et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search