4.3 Article

Chlorophyll fluorescence as a diagnostic tool for abiotic stress tolerance in wild and cultivated strawberry species

Journal

HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 280-286

Publisher

KOREAN SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-014-0006-9

Keywords

kinetics; non-photochemical quenching; photochemical quenching; stress indicators

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration of Korea
  2. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ907002092014] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence analysis was used to assess stress tolerance in wild and cultivated strawberry species. We found that the parameters, photochemical quenching (1-qP), non-photochemical quenching (qN), and maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), can serve as stress indicators because they are sensitive to early responses to stress. The most sensitive region used for measuring Chl fluorescence in strawberry leaves was the upper surfaces of leaflets located in the middle of new leaves. An analysis of the Chl fluorescence characteristics of strawberry species showed that octoploid species had greater stress tolerance than diploid species. The 'Whiteberry' maintained high levels of 1-qP and qN through the dissipation of excess excitation energy as heat during early stress treatment. These results suggest that 'Whiteberry' has a photoinhibition system that allows it to respond to stress in a more sensitive manner than other cultivars. Therefore, among the Chl fluorescence parameters examined, 1-qP and qN, can serve as good indicators for comparing stress tolerance, and they can be used to simultaneously screen many plants for stress tolerance in strawberry breeding programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available