4.2 Article

Restoring Functioning in Bipolar Disorder: Functional Remediation

Journal

HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 326-330

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000062

Keywords

bipolar disorder; functioning; neurocognition; psychosocial interventions

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, CIBERSAM
  2. Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FIS grant [PI 11/00637, PI 12/01498]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (European Union)
  4. Commission for Universities and Research grant [2014 SGR 398]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Learning Objectives After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to: 1. Assess the importance of remediation programs as adjunctive interventions for patients with bipolar disorder. 2. Evaluate a remediation program to improve functional outcome in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Abstract Over the past several years, many evidence-based interventions have proven to be effective as adjunctive therapies in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Only a few, however, have addressed the issue of functional recovery in bipolar euthymic patients, which is difficult to achieve after an affective episode. The functional remediation program has been designed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona with the main aim of treating functional impairment in bipolar disorder. The program consists of 21 weekly group sessions and is based on a neuro-cognitive-behavioral approach. Throughout the sessions, euthymic patients are trained in the use of neurocognitive skills to be applied during their daily routines. Modeling techniques, role playing, self-instructions, verbal instructions, positive reinforcement, and metacognitive cues are some of the techniques that are used in the program. The present report aims at explaining this new intervention to improve functional outcomes in euthymic bipolar patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available